Aquarius II on eBay didn't sell at over $400

From: Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk_at_yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Mon Jan 19 18:45:44 2004

On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 23:17, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Witchy wrote:

> > this problem. I also can't be the only Outlook 2000 user here, can I? Could
> > it not also be a problem with the list software since it never used to do it
> > before?
>
> Doubtful. Your messages are among the very, very few where I have this
> problem (there is only one other person with the same problem but I can't
> remember who).

Well hang on.. surely it's legal protocol-wise for witchy to put the
reply-to field in the header for email that he sends, even though the
from: field is also present and valid?

Isn't it a little quirky for the list software to append to any existing
reply-to field rather than overwriting it? (which for a mailing list
might seem more sensible).

If the list software is set to always overwrite any reply-to field then
this would solve this particular problem, and for any future instances -
it's bound to crop up again at some point.

witchy: you didn't ever run any kind of ISP's setup software on the
machine from which you read mail do you? I've seen them bugger about
with email settings something chronic before if you're using one of the
MS clients to read mail.

(Curiously in Evolution if I reply to witchy's posts it goes to both him
and the list by default. If I just say "reply to list" then it just goes
to the list as expected. A feature that works... even though it isn't
too useful :)

cheers

Jules
Received on Mon Jan 19 2004 - 18:45:44 GMT