Hi
If you guys are intending to build a Z8000 machine to
run CP/M-8000, you should let me know. There are a couple
hardware restrictions you should know about early on.
Dwight
>From: "Kane, David (DPS)" <David.Kane_at_aph.gov.au>
>
>The Z8000 segmented address scheme has two forms. The long form that you
>described uses two 16 bit values (registers or memory locations). The
>short form uses a single 16 bit value with the 7 bit segment number in
>bits 9-15 and an 8 bit offset into the segment in bits 1-8. Bit 16 of
>the first 16 bit value is a flag which indicates long or short segment
>address. This is important for memory addresses operands as the CPU can
>get an address word operand from memory, and then based on the flag bit
>can decide if the next word must be read to get the complete long
>address. In either case the segment address is located in the same place
>in either a short segment address or the first word of a long segmented
>address.
>
>David
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org
>> [mailto:cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of SHAUN RIPLEY
>> Sent: Monday, 26 July 2004 1:27 PM
>> To: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
>> Subject: z8000 segment scheme question
>>
>>
>> I picked up one of my computer books today and read
>> that z8000 uses one 16 bit register to hold the 7 bit
>> segment number and one register to hold the 16 bit
>> offset. The strange thing is that the segment number
>> is hold in position of bit 9-14 other than the bottom
>> half of the first register. I goggled and found
>> complaint about this scheme but no one explained why
>> it was designed so. Could somebody on the list tell me why?
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________
>> Do you Yahoo!?
>> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
>http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
Received on Mon Jul 26 2004 - 19:19:16 BST