Yay, partial success!

From: joe heck <joeheck_at_splab.cas.neu.edu>
Date: Fri Feb 18 18:40:42 2005

I would think the easier test is to yank the SLU. Since the SLU test is
before the comprehensive memory test, the LED indicators would show a
different pattern.

Vintage Computer Festival wrote:

>On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>
>
>>>>>>>"Vintage" == Vintage Computer Festival <vcf_at_siconic.com> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> Vintage> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
>> >> No, because D2 means the microcode isn't running. It turns out
>> >> that all the information on the net and in the KDJ11-A manual is
>> >> *wrong*. D3 means there is a memory fault, D4 means there is an
>> >> SLU fault. My 512kw board is broken. I only have 32kw to play
>> >> with, but it's enough to boot RT-11!
>>
>> Vintage> Are you sure? It sounds like you against the world, and
>> Vintage> generally speaking, the world usually wins ;)
>>
>>RT (at least the older releases, for example RT SJ V2) will run just
>>fine in 8 kwords... So Gordon has plenty of memory to play with.
>>
>>
>
>But I'm talking about the LED. He's convinced that the DEC manual is
>wrong with regards to the D3 LED, which I find a little hard to swallow.
>
>It would be great if there was a simple memory test he could poke in
>through ODT to test the memory and see if it does crap out above 32K.
>
>
>
Received on Fri Feb 18 2005 - 18:40:42 GMT