What's with the raw HTML?

From: Uncle Roger <sinasohn_at_ricochet.net>
Date: Tue Mar 17 00:30:47 1998

At 06:23 PM 3/15/98 -0500, you wrote:
>need for a company to have a fancy letterhead, nor a mass mailer to have
>colored brochures, nor ladies to have flowered and/or scented stationery,
>yet we do have all these things, and more. Consider how boring text-only,

Note that for most of these, there is no difference to the recipient. It
doesn't take any longer to open a color brochure than one in black and
white, logos don't take up any more space than the text, etc. In terms of
e-mail, it's completely different. Those logos do take up space, color
stuff does take longer to download. (And btw, there are a lot of people
who are very allergic to the scented ads included with Macy's bills, and
even a fair number of us who just get nauseated.)

>not trivial point. Nevertheless, technology marches on, and as cable modems
>(or whatever) become the norm rather than the exception, "waste" of

Really? As of last fall, 80% of americans accessed the net at 14.4Kbps or
less. (According to a speaker at the Bay Area Internet Users Group.) Add
in the rest of the world and that goes way down. Damn yanks, always
thinking nobody else matters!

>public at large. If my wife wants to embed scanned newspaper clippings or a
>kid's picture in an email to her cousin across country, who am I (or anyone)
>to object?

That's a different matter. If I send an e-mail to a potential client
touting my services, that's one thing. To send a message selling used golf
balls to every e-mail address I can find, that's spam.



--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-

Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger_at_sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Received on Tue Mar 17 1998 - 00:30:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:31:09 BST