John Foust skrev:
>At 10:36 PM 3/30/01 +0100, you wrote:
>>John Foust skrev:
>>>128M is sick? It's not just an OS, it's an OS plus who knows what.
>>
>>Then they should learn to keep things neatly apart. And what would require
>>128 megs of RAM? Simulations of a glaxy or two?
>What's to keep neatly apart for a consumer PC? They want all
>the latest, not a microcontroller or DOS 3.0.
I'm not talking about a microcontroller or DOS 3.0 either! Could you keep this
at a civil level? I'm talking about a windowing OS, and why would that require
128 MB?
>It's the minimum recommended for typical use, which Microsoft will
>happily define as the amount needed to make the OS functional,
>plus being able to run a bunch of Microsoft apps. These days
>that includes cable modems stuffing music and video and
>bloat and crap onto 30 gig HDs.
But then that's another thing. Apps are not the same as the OS and may be
chosen according to requirements.
>Surprisingly, the memory makers and PC makers don't seem to complain as
>requirements increase.
Exactly.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
Fernsehen ist das einzige Schlafmittel, das mit den Augen genommen wird.
--- Vittorio de Sica
Received on Fri Mar 30 2001 - 18:20:42 BST